Cynthia Nkiruka Tooley MBE

​​

For 2 years, I was forbidden from speaking by Contra mundum orders and SuperInjunctions made at Milton Keynes Court who perhaps forgot to tell me that Parliament never gave them powers to make super injunctions. "In England and Wales, superinjunctions and contra mundum (against the world) orders are derived from the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court, most notably empowered by Section 37(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981. When a court exceeds the powers given to it by parliament, it is acting ultra-vires.
Ultra-vires Orders, are void ab-initio. i.e, they are invalid from the start.  However, the usual process to challenge an ultra-vires order is to make a set aside application.

I have tried this. Repeatedly.

And found my appeals access blocked by the same court whose orders I am trying to appeal. How? Glad you asked. Because any judge looking at an appeal, needs to havean account of what took place at the original hearing. This is provided by either of these documents  verbatim transcript or approved judgement.

In my case, my applications to the Milton Keynes court for verbatim transcripts, has been largely unsuccessful.

Instead often, they have granted "approved judgements" that omits material facts, or worse, that claim I consented to things I did not consent to. This is relevant. A  "consent" at a hearing cannot be overturned by an appeal. So this consent claim is a strategically serious claim to make when a person did not in fact, consent. I have repeatedly had appeals fail because the appellate judge believed the what they read in the approved judgement that I consented.

Only for subsequent verbatim transcripts to disprove the "approved judgements". These are serious court failings. Some might even say, abuse of public office.
Meanwhile, the newspapers, keep their false articles up and try to bankrupt me for daring to bring a defamation claim, whilst I am simultaneously gagged from even correcting the article. To say my family and I suffered mental anguish is an understatement. And this is happening all in the name of the law. Something told me the british public wouldn't stand for this. We ran a survey, 100% were outraged and felt they had a right to know.
So don't take my word for it. Demand the documents. And an enquiry.

If it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone. Hearings set precedents.
So I made one report. And the treatment by courts and media led to me making another report. This is the second report. To the British Public.